Bombay HC questions petitioners' right to sue against Prada in Kolhapuri chappal row
text_fields
Mumbai: On Wednesday, the Bombay High Court dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) against Italian fashion brand Prada for alleged unauthorised use of the iconic Kolhapuri chappal.
A bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne questioned the “locus” and statutory right of the five advocates who had filed the PIL, saying they were not the aggrieved persons or the registered proprietor or owner of the footwear.
“You are not the owner of this Kolhapuri chappal. What is your locus and what is the public interest? Any person aggrieved can file a suit. What is the public interest in this,” the court asked, PTI reported.
The plea had said the Kolhapuri chappal (sandals) is protected as a Geographical Indication (GI) under the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act.
The bench then said that the registered proprietor of the GI Tag can come to court and espouse their own action. The court dismissed the plea and said it would pass a detailed order later.
In their spring/summer collection, Prada showcased their toe-ring sandals', which the petition said are deceptively similar to the Kolhapuri chappals. These sandals are priced at Rs 1 lakh per pair.
